Ok, this isn't life or death....but you ladies are beauty addicts, you understand ;)
So my last post was about the Longchamp purse and how much I LOVED that bag. A week later, I still do, if not more. There's just something about it. It's sleek (can bags be sleek? haha), it holds all I need to stuff into it, it doesn't way down my shoulder. I can go on forever(I promise this isn't just another musing about this amazing bag).
So my dilemma: I mentioned that I was saving up for the LV Neverfull MM. I have been in love with that bag for months now. It's chic, classic, roomy. Hm. Sound familiar? In my previous post, someone mentioned that they were happy I found an alternative to the Neverfull, however my intention was to have the bag as a filler bag until I buy my Neverfull. Now, the more I think about it...aren't they really similar?
OBVIOUSLY, it's different material, brand, name, etc...but, let's observe:
They're shapes are kind of similar even (anybody also think so?)
So, I know you're thinking...what's the dilemma you need an opinion on?? Well, do I really need both?
Here are some neutral facts:
1. I was looking for a sturdy, roomy bag I can use for everything (school, life, etc.), and I found one.
2. I was dying to be able to save up for the Neverfull and have that pride of having earned it on my own.
3. I HATE switching up bags. I get so used to a purse, and ....bond with it haha. Also, I ALWAYS forget something in the bag I take things out of. So when I get the Neverfull, I just know I'll neglect my Longchamp. That'll hurt it's feeling, won't it? (lol)
I'm a little confused (and sorry if I've confused you now haha). I would love your opinions and inputs. Do you have both? How do they compare? Do you have one of them? What's your favorite thing about it?